In the case of Marriott Corporation vs. Dasta Construction Company, Dasta claimed additional costs due to delays casued by the Owner, but lost he case because __________.
1. there was specific language in the contract that allowed the Owner to modify the schedule.
2. they could not prove weather delays impacted the construction progress.
3. the court decided Dasta did not properly staff the job.
4. Dasta did not provide an as-built schedule for the court to review.
