Why was an injunction an appropriate remedy in EEOC v. DCP Midstream L.P., 608 F. Supp. 2d 107 (D. Maine 2009) when the plaintiff did not produce evidence of discrimination that went beyond his case and the discrimination was not ongoing?
a) The EEOC sought injunctive relief to vindicate the public's interest in preventing future acts of discrimination.
b) The court believed that there was a reasonable probability of further noncompliance with Title VII.
c) Both a and b.
d) None of the above.
