As the U.S. Constitution was being written, some of the Framers were concerned that the national government might have too much power over the state governments. This was a major point advocated by the Response area, who were skeptical over the Constitution in general . Additionally, they thought that having Senators serve Response area year terms- and having them chosen by politicians in the state would combine to prevent the Senate from becoming too vulnerable to impulses and the fleeting moods of the people. So in Response area when the Constitution was finally and originally ratified, Response area, Section 3- which established the Senate- required that the two senators from each state be chosen by Response area. This stood in contrast to the U.S. House of Representatives in which said each state’s representation would be Response area by citizens of the districts in each state. This was the way it was done for about the first 120 years of the country’s history.
Protests, though, began decades before the 17th Amendment ever was added. People began to complain that Senators were only concerned with issues involving the elite and Response area members of society. This sentiment really picked up steam in the late-1800s and early-1900s in the Response area. One reformer in particular- William Jennings Bryan- campaigned heavily for the Response area of U.S. Senators in order to end the corruption he felt was widespread in the Senate. By 1911, calls for electoral reform- and all sorts of reform- were strong enough that Congress took up the issue, and by early-Response area enough states ratified the proposal to make it the law of the land.
