Under federal law, may Wilma testify about whether defendant Dan was cooperative, appeared logical and seemed to understand the events before and during the trial?
a) Yes, because the testimony is regarding nonconfidential matters.
b) Yes, because the attorney-client privilege does not include post-trial hearings.
c) No, because the testimony is regarding a confidential client matter.
d) No, because Wilma is not an expert on competency.
