On page 2 of the article "Weak Signals Versus Strong Paradigms" (by C. K. Prahalad), the author lists six issues that seem to challenge traditional thinking in strategy - i. E. What we typically discussed in class and what is given in the text-books. He then discusses his own view-points on each of these in some detail, and provides several examples to support his arguments.
As an answer to this question, I would like you to do the following:
(a) Clearly state your position on the issues, taking each of the six questions in turn. You may choose to agree, disagree, or have an alternative viewpoint from the one presented by the author. Provide at least one example from the real-world to support your arguments.
(b) Keeping in mind that the article was published several years back, list THREE (3) other questions that you believe Prahalad could have added to his list of six if he were to write this article in 2020. Again, state your position on them and provide at least one example to support your position
